Background information
In the virtual mailbox, the participants have to process regularly arriving informations. The online exercise is furthermore designed dynamically, it “reacts” interactively to the participants’ answers.
The entire management simulation consists of 134 questions in a total of 24 documents. For most questions multiple answers are possible, but for some a choice must be made. In addition, some questions require a decision which cannot be reversed.
Norm sample
Currently, the simulation is based on a large norm sample of 1264 persons aged 23 to 61.
Leadership experience within the norm sample
The norm sample includes professionals (39%) and managers (61%):
Age distribution within the norm sample
Individuals in the norm sample are on average 38.3 years old with a standard deviation of 8.3 years.
Quality criterias
Reliability
The primary scale “general management skills” measures the ability to analyse effectively, to plan sensibly and to take appropriate decisions under time pressure in a framework of various circumstances with plenty of partial facts which need to be prioritized. For this primary scale, the split-half reliability (split-half according to the odd/even method) is 0.73 and the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) is 0.68.
Content Validity
Korrelation with the aptitude test BOMAT (= Construct Validity)
In a comparative study comparing the results of 96 people who performed both the management simulation as well as the “BOMAT advanced – short version”, a correlation between the result of the BOMAT and the overall simulation score of 0.63 was observed, which is highly significant as well.
Objectivity
The management simulation can be executed entirely without instruction and without interpretation by a moderator. The digital execution ensures a standardized procedure and does not allow any variation by the participants. The construction of the test with multiple-choice items and without open questions allows a clear and standardized evaluation. This evaluation is carried out by an algorithm that does not provide different interpretations. Thus, the simulation has an extremely high evaluation objectivity and guarantees a constantly equal determination of the results in every case when using the same norm sample.
Overall, the simulation can claim a very high objectivity of execution, evaluation and interpretation.
Data privacy
Transparency for participants
- first name and name
- age
- male or female
- current managerial responsibility
Maximum protection of personal data
- age,
- male / female,
- current managerial responsibility,
- answer item ,
- answer item 2,
- answer item 3,
- etc…
Feedback by participants
We asked the participants of the management simulation for their opinion. Immediately after the simulation, they were asked to answer some questions online. The answers were stored separately from the simulation and completely anonymously (N = 254).
Survey statements
- When executing such a test, it is important to me that my privacy is protected.
- Personal data transmitted during such a simulation could be misused.
- A good result in this simulation means that a person can perform the job as a leader well.
- A person who performs strongly in this simulation is also a good manager.
- I have experienced the issues in this simulation in a similar form in my job.
Participants could select the following answers for each statement:
Evaluation
The participants’ answers are remarkable in various respects. The issue of data privacy is perceived as particularly important by the vast majority, at the same time, the majority trusts in the management simulation that their data will not be misused.
Regarding the question “Success in the management simulation = success as a manager?”, the participants tend to think that a good result in the management simulation also means that the person can successfully manage the tasks of a manager.
The majority of the participants indicate that they have experienced situations similar to those in the simulation in their professional work.